Judicial reorganization: how it works and when it applies
Judicial reorganization is a legal instrument for companies in crisis that are still viable. Understanding it helps business owners assess alternatives before the situation worsens.
What judicial reorganization is
Judicial reorganization is a procedure provided for in the Corporate Reorganization and Bankruptcy Law that seeks to enable a company to overcome an economic and financial crisis, preserving its activity, jobs and the interests of creditors. Unlike bankruptcy, the central objective is to keep the company operating through a reorganization plan negotiated with the creditors.
Which companies can request it
In general, entrepreneurs and business entities that meet certain legal requirements — such as a period of regular business activity and the absence of certain impediments — may request judicial reorganization. The law also provides for specific treatment for micro-enterprises and small businesses. Whether it applies depends on the specific situation of each business.
Main stages of the process
- The initial petition demonstrating the crisis and the company's viability
- The court's approval of the processing and the appointment of the judicial administrator
- Submission of the reorganization plan within the legal deadline
- Analysis and voting on the plan by the creditors, when there is an objection
- Granting of the reorganization and a period of monitoring the plan's fulfillment
Effects of the request
One of the main effects is the temporary suspension of certain collections and enforcement actions against the company for a period, which usually provides breathing room for negotiation with creditors. During the process, the company generally remains under the management of its partners, but becomes subject to oversight by the judicial administrator and the court.
When judicial reorganization makes sense
Judicial reorganization is usually considered when the company faces a significant crisis but still shows prospects of viability and the capacity to reorganize. In less severe situations, alternatives such as direct renegotiation with creditors or out-of-court reorganization may be more appropriate. Choosing the path depends on a technical analysis of each case.
Frequently asked questions
Is judicial reorganization the same as bankruptcy?
No. Judicial reorganization seeks to preserve the company and enable it to overcome the crisis, keeping its activity going. Bankruptcy, in turn, occurs when continuity does not prove viable and leads to the liquidation of assets to pay the creditors. They are distinct procedures, even though governed by the same law.
Does the company keep operating during judicial reorganization?
As a rule, yes. During judicial reorganization, the company normally maintains its activities and management remains with the partners, under the oversight of the judicial administrator and the court. This very continuity is one of the central objectives of the instrument.
Need guidance on this topic?
This article is informational. For guidance on your specific case, talk to our team.